Welcome to Premium Paper Help

Description Discussion Question: Discuss “internal and external validity errors that researchers should focus while conducting a

Description

Discussion Question: Discuss “internal and

external validity errors that researchers

should focus while conducting a research

study”.

Instructions for Completing the Discussion

Questions:

Post your original response by Tuesday 30 April 2024

at 11:59 PM.

  • Your response should be a minimum of 5
  • sentences but should not exceed 250 words.

  • Appropriately cite the references.
  • Respond to at least 2 of your classmates by Saturday

    4 May 2024 at 11:59 PM.

  • Your response to your classmate should be
  • substantive in nature for example:

    a) State agreements and provide additional

    supportive evidence or examples

    b) Ask additional questions for clarification or

    provide additional ideas or perspectives on the

    answer

    c) Advance the participant’s ideas further by

    providing additional references or support and

    providing feedback on the participant’s

    experience or perspectives.

    d) State disagreements, It any, but provide

    evidence or support, using professional tone

    and netiquette.

    Share This Post

    Email
    WhatsApp
    Facebook
    Twitter
    LinkedIn
    Pinterest
    Reddit

    Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

    Related Questions

    This essay should be 3-4 pages (800-1250 words) in length and must have a minimum of two (2) outside sources from a credible site/book/database as evidence

    This essay should be 3-4 pages (800-1250 words) in length and must have a minimum of two (2) outside sources from a credible site/book/database as evidence to support your claim(s). You must use the MLA style heading and follow all other MLA guidelines for formatting (12 pt. Times New Roman font, number the pages, double spaced, 1-inch margins, etc.). Choose

    The readings this week covered a lot of information regarding patient portals, protected health information (PHI), privacy, engagement, and ethical a

    The readings this week covered a lot of information regarding patient portals, protected health information (PHI), privacy, engagement, and ethical and legal responsibilities. We learned that patient-generated health data (PGHD) can increase patient engagement and the quality of care provided. We also read about the advancement of ancestry data and

    Title: GLP-1 Agonist and Anesthesia   Methodology Search strategy (description with enough detail to rerun the search) Study selection and screening

    Title: GLP-1 Agonist and Anesthesia   Methodology Search strategy (description with enough detail to rerun the search) Study selection and screening method (PRISMA flow diagram from the study selection process) Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Data collection (method used to screen and appraise articles) and Analysis (tool used to assess quality of articles)

    Description Bonomi, L., Jiang, X., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2020). Protecting patient privacy in survival analyses. Journal of the American Medical

    Description Bonomi, L., Jiang, X., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2020). Protecting patient privacy in survival analyses. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(3), 366–375. Discuss your response to this survival analysis study. Do you have the same concerns as the researchers regarding the patient privacy issues when presenting actuarial/survival analysis