Welcome to Premium Paper Help

Help with homework worksheet Requires Lopeswrite Assessment Description Special education teachers are part of the assessment team that determines

Help with homework worksheet

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Special education teachers are part of the assessment team that determines eligibility for special education services. There are 14 major eligibility categories defined by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). For each of these disability categories, educators must have general knowledge of the guidelines for eligibility, characteristics, causes, effects on learning, and how often the disabilities occur within a defined population in order to contribute to team collaboration and consult articulately with staff and parents/guardians. Additionally, there are specific conditions, such as dyslexia, that are included within each of the broad categories, and special education teachers must be well informed about the potential effects on learning for each specific disorder.

Use the information in the textbook and topic Resources to complete the “Disability Comparison” template to summarize information for the categories of disability under IDEA as well as for common, specific learning disabilities. The first category, Autism, is completed for you.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

Resources to use:

Categories of Disability Under Part B of IDEA – Center for Parent Information and Resources (parentcenterhub.org)

Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities | LD OnLine

Through your child’s eyes (understood.org)

Fact Sheets – International Dyslexia Association (dyslexiaida.org)

Universal Screening: K–2 Reading – International Dyslexia Association (dyslexiaida.org)

Dyslexia | Reading Rockets

Model Code of Ethics for Educators (MCEE) – National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification (nasdtec.net)

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Criteria Ratings Points Content: Introduction 16 to >14 pts Advanced Accurately and concisely describes the individual interviewed;

Criteria Ratings Points Content: Introduction 16 to >14 pts Advanced Accurately and concisely describes the individual interviewed; selection criteria and setting; and positionality to subject/participant. 14 to >12 pts Proficient Describes the individual interviewed; selection criteria and setting; and positionality to subject/participant. 12 to >0 pts Developing Description is inaccurate,

Generational Ethics in Business Generational ethics influence workplace dynamics. As generations change, businesses must adapt

Generational Ethics in Business Generational ethics influence workplace dynamics. As generations change, businesses must adapt to diverse ethical priorities, and foster cross-generational collaboration for sustainable success. Case 2 Resources Text:  5.2 Business Ethics over Time  (2023)  Text:  11.1 Business Ethics in an Evolving Environment  (2023)  Do Work Ethics Differ By

   General Instructions Consider the quality measures data currently analyzed at your practice location. If you do not have a current practice location,

   General Instructions Consider the quality measures data currently analyzed at your practice location. If you do not have a current practice location, select a local healthcare facility or provider to answer the questions below.   Include the following sections: I. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. ·

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Lila Davis

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Lila Davis Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in