Welcome to Premium Paper Help

Criteria Ratings Points Content: Introduction 16 to >14 pts Advanced Accurately and concisely describes the individual interviewed;

Criteria Ratings Points

Content: Introduction 16 to >14 pts

Advanced

Accurately and concisely
describes the individual
interviewed; selection
criteria and setting; and
positionality to
subject/participant.

14 to >12 pts

Proficient

Describes the individual
interviewed; selection
criteria and setting; and
positionality to
subject/participant.

12 to >0 pts

Developing

Description is
inaccurate, vague,
or wordy.

0 pts

Not
Present

16 pts

Content: Methods 18 to >16 pts

Advanced

Accurately and concisely
develops interview
questions.

16 to >14 pts

Proficient

Develops interview
questions.

14 to >0 pts

Developing

Interview protocol
and/or transcript is
inaccurate, vague,
or wordy.

0 pts

Not
Present

18 pts

Content: Results 18 to >16 pts

Advanced

Accurately and concisely
summarizes
themes/patterns that
emerged during the
interview.

16 to >14 pts

Proficient

Summarizes
themes/patterns that
emerged during the
interview.

14 to >0 pts

Developing

Summary is
inaccurate, vague,
or wordy.

0 pts

Not
Present

18 pts

Content: Conclusion 18 to >16 pts

Advanced

Accurately and concisely
discusses results in relation
to foundational and
theoretical principles of
metacognition and
self-regulated learning. At
least three research
sources are scholarly and
within the last five years.

16 to >14 pts

Proficient

Discusses results in
relation to foundational
and theoretical principles
of metacognition and
self-regulated learning.
At least two research
sources are scholarly
but are not within the
last five years.

14 to >0 pts

Developing

Discussion is
inaccurate, vague,
or wordy. Research
sources are not
scholarly.

0 pts

Not
Present

18 pts

Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning Interview Grading Rubric |
EDUC776_B02_202440

Criteria Ratings Points

Structure: Length 10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Develops Introduction,
Methods, Results, and
Conclusion sections fully
and completely using the
guidelines of one to two
paragraphs per section.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

Develops Introduction,
Methods, Results, and
Conclusion sections
using less than one to
two paragraphs per
section. Writing is vague
and/or underdeveloped

7 to >0 pts

Developing

Develops
Introduction,
Methods, Results,
and Conclusion
sections using
more than one to
two paragraphs per
section. Writing is
too wordy and not
concise.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Structure: APA
Formatting

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

Uses APA formatting
guidelines accurately and
consistently.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

1-2 issues present with
APA formatting
guidelines.

7 to >0 pts

Developing

More than two
issues with APA
formatting
guidelines are
present.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Structure:
Grammar/Mechanics

10 to >9 pts

Advanced

No issues with grammar or
mechanics are present.

9 to >7 pts

Proficient

1-2 issues present with
grammar or mechanics

7 to >0 pts

Developing

More than two
issues with
grammar or
mechanics are
present.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning Interview Grading Rubric |
EDUC776_B02_202440

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Five to seven pages in length. Not including reference/bibliography page(s). Do not use a cover page. The History Department uses Chicago/Turabian

Five to seven pages in length. Not including reference/bibliography page(s). Do not use a cover page. The History Department uses Chicago/Turabian formatting. But I would accept APA formatting. Writing Expectations I once thought college-level students came to class with firmly established writing skills. Experience demonstrates this is not necessarily the