Welcome to Premium Paper Help

premiumpaperhelp.com logo

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Due Date: 11:59 p.m. EST Points: 100 Overview: You will examine in greater depth the processes, functioning, and well-being of families based

Due Date: 11:59 p.m. EST
Points: 100

Overview:

You will examine in greater depth the processes, functioning, and well-being of families
based on their forms or configurations, cultural dimensions, and developmental tasks
across the lifespan.

Instructions:

• First, select a family form/configuration. You will discuss the functioning, well-

being and challenges of these families. Some examples are:

o Single parent
o Multigenerational households
o Two-parent
o Teen parent
o Gender-diverse parents
o LGBTQ parents or children
o Remarried households
o Foster or adoptive families

• Next, discuss the cultural dimensions that impact the family form/configuration

you chose. For example, how does race/ethnicity impact the family? What role

does social class play?

• Then, discuss the challenges and strengths of this family form/configuration

across the lifespan. You will need to briefly address each stage of Erikson’s

psychosocial development theory.

• Last, discuss intervention or prevention efforts that would be helpful for your

identified family form/configuration throughout the life cycle. You may even select

different intervention/prevention efforts depending on the life cycle stage of the

family unit.

Requirements:

• Submit a Word document in APA format.

HSV332 – Family Systems Dynamics

Modern Day Families

• Maximum 7 pages in length, excluding the Title and Reference pages.

• At least three scholarly resources, in addition to the course textbook.

Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.

Evaluation Rubric for Modern Day Families Assignment

CRITERIA Deficient Needs
Improvement

Proficient Exemplary

0-23 Points 24-31 Points 32-39 Points 40 Points

Structure

Well-
developed
paragraphs,
complete
sentences, title
page, body of
work meets
requirements,
references,
followed the
example
specifically

Organizational
structure and
paragraphing
have
serious and
persistent
errors.
Directions were
ignored and
information
provided
was insufficient
to
meet
assignment
guidelines.

Written work
inadequate for
college-level
work;
Paragraphing
and
transitions are
inadequate;
inappropriate
guidelines
outlined
for paper were
not
met with
several
problems (see
directions).

Written work is
clear
and adequate
college-level
work;
Paragraphing
and
transitions are
adequate;
appropriate
guidelines
outlined
for paper were
met
with a few
noted
problems (see
directions).

Written work is
clear and
excellent
college-level
work;
Paragraphing
and
transitions are
clear
and
appropriate;
appropriate
guidelines
outlined
for paper were
met
(see
directions).

0-29 Points 30-39 Points 40-49 Points 50 Points

Content

Demonstrates
knowledge of
topics, through
discussion of
concepts,
appropriate
integrate of
topics on
directions;
scholarly
journal use

Written work
does
not cover the
assigned topic;
assertions are
not
supported by
evidence;
paper is
seriously
lacking in
content and
detail;
scholarly
journals
were not used
or
used properly.

Written work
does
not do an
adequate
job of covering
the
assigned topic;
assertions are
weakly
supported
by evidence;
paper
is inadequate
in
meeting the
page
and content
area
requirements;
less

The length of
the
written work is
sufficient to
cover
the topic;
assertions
are supported
by
evidence; does
not
meet full
required
number of
pages
and content
areas.
Required
number of
scholarly
journals

The length of
the
written work
provides in-
depth
coverage of the
topics,
assertions
are clearly
supported by
evidence;
Paper meets
required length
of
pages and
content
areas; More
than the
required
number of

than the
required
number of
scholarly
journals were
used.

were used. scholarly
journals
were used.

0-5 Points 6-7 Points 8-9 Points 10 Points

Mechanics

Spelling;
grammar; use
of
APA style

Written work
had
serious and
persistent
errors in
word selection
and
use; sentence
structure,
spelling,
grammar,
punctuation
was
inappropriate
and
with serious
errors;
APA style was
completely
unacceptable.

Written work
had
several major
errors
in word
selection
and use;
sentence
structure,
spelling,
grammar,
punctuation
was
inappropriate;
APA
style was
unacceptable
with a
few to multiple
errors.

Written work
was
generally free
of
errors in word
selection and
use;
sentence
structure,
spelling,
grammar,
punctuation
was
adequate; APA
style
was acceptable
with
a few errors.

Written work
has no
major errors in
word
selection and
use;
sentence
structure,
spelling,
grammar,
punctuation
was
appropriate;
APA
style was
acceptable with
no
to few errors.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Overview You are an HR consultant, hired to resolve issues stemming from communication and coordination challenges between employees of the U.S. branch and

Overview You are an HR consultant, hired to resolve issues stemming from communication and coordination challenges between employees of the U.S. branch and the Singaporean headquarters of a software solutions provider. You decide to recommend organization-wide changes to resolve the issues related to communication and coordination. You evaluate the organizational

1 Case Study Instructions and Requirements Please review the following before preparing the Case Study Assignment: Academic Integrity: All

1 Case Study Instructions and Requirements Please review the following before preparing the Case Study Assignment: Academic Integrity: All forms of academic dishonesty are prohibited at Valencia College. Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, acts or attempted acts of plagiarism, cheating, furnishing false information, forgery, alteration or misuse

In Watch: What is a Ph.D.?,

In Watch: What is a Ph.D.?, read-Psychology and Christianity : Five Views by Eric L. Johnson, , David G. Myers, , Stanton L. Jones, , Robert C. Roberts, , P. J. Watson, , John H. Coe, , Todd W. Hall, , and David A. Powlison PUBLISHER InterVarsity Press DATE 2010-07-07