Welcome to Premium Paper Help

  Governance in Public Administration: Case Studies  Criteria Ratings Points Thread Content 15 to >13.0 pts Advanced • Each

  Governance in Public Administration: Case Studies 

Criteria Ratings Points

Thread

Content

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

• Each question/prompt is
answered thoroughly and
logically. • Major points are
stated clearly and effectively.
• Clear, logical flow to post;
stayed on topic.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

• Each question/prompt is
answered. • Major points are
stated clearly and effectively for
the most part. • Clear, logical
and focused for the most part.

11 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• Not all facets
of the
prompt/questions
are answered.
• Lack of clarity,
coherence, logic
and focus in key
areas.

0 pts

Not
Present

15 pts

Thread

Research
Engagement

13 to >10.0 pts

Advanced

• Ideas from all the required
reading and presentations
from the Module: Week and 2
scholarly sources are
integrated. • Relates topic to
Scripture/biblical principles
where appropriate.

10 to >8.0 pts

Proficient

• Ideas from most the required
reading and presentations from
the Module: Week and 2
scholarly sources are
integrated. • Scripture/biblical
principles are included but
unfocused at times.

8 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• Ideas from few
of the required
reading and
presentations
from the Module:
Week and 2
scholarly sources
are integrated.
• Missing Biblical
integration.

0 pts

Not
Present

13 pts

Reply

Content

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

• 2 unique interaction posts
with classmates • One reply
posted to each of 2
classmates’ threads. • Moves
the conversation forward with
new ideas, research, and
analysis. • Student’s response
delivered in a thorough,
thoughtful, and analytical
manner with the student’s
position clearly evident.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

• At least 2 unique interaction
posts with classmates • One
reply posted to each of 2
classmates’ threads. • New
ideas, research, and analysis
are not always included.
• Some commentary is
repetitive from one reply to the
next. • At times, reply posts do
not seem to actually build upon
classmate’s post.

11 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• Missing one or
more reply posts.
• Reply posts
are redundant.
• Little in the
way of new
ideas, research,
and analysis are
not always
included.

0 pts

Not
Present

15 pts

Discussion Grading Rubric | PADM700_C01_202440

Criteria Ratings Points

Reply

Research
Engagement

10 to >8.0 pts

Advanced

• 2 unique interaction posts
with classmates • One reply
posted to each of 2
classmates’ threads.
• Relates topic to
Scripture/biblical principles
where appropriate.
• Contains abundant citations
from required reading,
presentations, and 2 scholarly
sources.

8 to >6.0 pts

Proficient

• 2 unique interaction posts
with classmates • One reply
posted to each of 2 classmates’
threads. • Scripture/biblical
principles are included but
unfocused at times. • Contains
some citations from reading,
presentations, and scholarly
sources.

6 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• Missing one or
more reply posts.
• Missing Biblical
integration.
• Limited
citations from the
required reading
and
presentations.

0 pts

Not
Present

10 pts

Grammar,
Spelling, &
APA

15 to >13.0 pts

Advanced

Minimal to no errors in
grammar, spelling, or APA.

13 to >11.0 pts

Proficient

Some errors in grammar,
spelling, or APA.

11 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Numerous errors
in grammar,
spelling, or APA.

0 pts

Not
Present

15 pts

Word Count 7 to >5.0 pts

Advanced

Appropriate word count:
450-500 words for thread;
200–250 words per reply.

5 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

100 words more or less than
the required length.

3 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Over 100 words
more or less than
the required
length.

0 pts

Not
Present

7 pts

Total Points: 75

Discussion Grading Rubric | PADM700_C01_202440

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi Electronic University College of Administrative and Financial Sciences Assignment 3 Communications Management (MGT 421) Due Date: 4/5/2023 @ 23:59 Course Name: Communication Management Student’s Name: Course Code: MGT421 Student’s ID Number: Semester: 2nd

In Watch: What is a Ph.D.?,

In Watch: What is a Ph.D.?, read-Psychology and Christianity : Five Views by Eric L. Johnson, , David G. Myers, , Stanton L. Jones, , Robert C. Roberts, , P. J. Watson, , John H. Coe, , Todd W. Hall, , and David A. Powlison PUBLISHER InterVarsity Press DATE 2010-07-07

Description avoid plagiarism All answers must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. Use APA style of referencing ‫المملكة

Description avoid plagiarism All answers must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. Use APA style of referencing ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi Electronic University College of Administrative and Financial Sciences Assignment 1 Entrepreneurship and small

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi Electronic University College of Administrative and Financial Sciences Assignment 1 Decision Making and Problem Solving (MGT 312) Due Date: End of Week 6, 5-10-2024 Course Name: Decision Making and Problem Student’s Name:z Solving

       Working Draft of Essay          Guidelines Essay 2-Argumentative Research EssayAssignment description:The objective of the argumentative research

       Working Draft of Essay          Guidelines Essay 2-Argumentative Research EssayAssignment description:The objective of the argumentative research essay is to investigate an important issue orproblem in today’s world and take a stance in the debate surrounding the issue. Your task is tomake a claim about a debatable topic and to

   DISCUSSION RESPONSE CHANGE CHAMPIONS DISCUSSION RESPONSE CHANGE CHAMPIONS Read a selection of your colleagues’ blog posts and respond to two of

   DISCUSSION RESPONSE CHANGE CHAMPIONS DISCUSSION RESPONSE CHANGE CHAMPIONS Read a selection of your colleagues’ blog posts and respond to two of your colleagues by expanding upon their responses or sharing additional or alternative perspectives.  PEER #1 Elycia Victoria Hernandez Change Champions and Opinion Leaders play distinct roles in organizational change especially in healthcare settings.

file below  derby.ac.uk Sensitivity: Internal BUSINESS CONSULTANCY PROJECT derby.ac.uk Sensitivity: Internal CW3. REFLECTION – Detailed

file below  derby.ac.uk Sensitivity: Internal BUSINESS CONSULTANCY PROJECT derby.ac.uk Sensitivity: Internal CW3. REFLECTION – Detailed Outline derby.ac.uk Sensitivity: Internal About CW3 Reflection Assessment Type: Individual Reflection Assessment weighting: P/F Word count/Length: 2000 words +/- 10% Learning Outcomes: 1 – 4 Submission Method: Turnitin (on Blackboard) Submission Date: 23:59 UK time,