Welcome to Premium Paper Help

Help with homework Assignment Outline: Cyberbullying and Sexting in Schools Court Cases and Research

Help with homework

Assignment Outline: Cyberbullying and Sexting in Schools

Court Cases and Research

Summarize (with citation)

Describe Impact

Rights and Responsibilities of Stakeholders

Student/ Family

1. Right

2. Responsibility

*Make sure you connect to a specific law or policy and cite

Teacher/ Staff

Student/ Family

1. Right

2. Responsibility

*Make sure you connect to a specific law or policy and cite

Administration/ School Board

1. Right

2. Responsibility

*Make sure you connect to a specific law or policy and cite

Examination of Teaching and Classroom Practices

Candidate describes multiple perspectives in terms of how teaching and classroom practices intersect with the selected topic/issue or the rights/responsibilities of stakeholders.

1. How it intersects with stakeholder group 1

2. How it intersects with stakeholder group 2

3. How it intersects with stakeholder group 3

Recommendations

1. At least 2 recommendations

2. Explain how they support the law/ policy

3. Explain tradeoffs (financial impact and impact to learning)

Undergraduate Percentage Scale:

0.00 – 57.49%

57.50 – 76.24%

76.25 – 93.74%

93.75 – 100%

Undergraduate Scaled Score:

0.0 – 0.6

0.7 – 2.1

2.2 – 3.5

3.6 – 4.0

% of Grade

Below Standard

Approaching Standard

At Standard

Exceeds Standard

Court Cases and Research

25

Candidate identifies court cases and/or research that have broad/vague connections to the selected topic/issue.

Candidate identifies and describes court cases and/or research with connections to the selected topic/issue.

Candidate identifies and describes court cases and research that are relevant to the selected topic/issue. More than one perspective on the topic/issue is included.

At Standard, plus:
Candidate evaluates the relative strength and impact of court cases and research with respect to the selected topic/issue.

Rights and Responsibilities of Stakeholders

25

Candidate identifies limited stakeholders or rights/responsibilities for the selected topic/issue.

Candidate identifies some relevant stakeholders for the topic/issue. Candidate describes general rights and/or responsibilities for the selected issue/topic.

Candidate identifies all relevant stakeholders for the topic/issue. Candidate describes both the rights and responsibilities of each stakeholder.

At Standard, plus:
Candidate evaluates the relative strength and impact of the rights and responsibilities of the stakeholders.

Examination of Teaching and Classroom Practices

25

Candidate describes general education practices or specific teaching and classroom practices with limited connection to the selected topic/issue.

Candidate describes general educational practices that relate generally to the selected topic/issue.

Candidate describes how relevant teaching and classroom practices intersect with the selected topic/issue.

At Standard, plus:
Candidate describes multiple perspectives in terms of how teaching and classroom practices intersect with the selected topic/issue or the rights/responsibilities of stakeholders.

Recommendations

25

Candidate makes recommendations for teaching and classroom practices that represent limited legal implications and/or stakeholder rights/responsibilities.

Candidate makes recommendations for teaching and classroom practices based on legal implications and/or stakeholder rights/responsibilities.

Candidate makes recommendations for teaching and classroom practices that reflect careful consideration of different legal implications and stakeholder rights/responsibilities. Candidate supports recommendations with references/precedents from legal cases or research.

At Standard, plus:
Candidate evaluates the extent to which recommendations address legal implications and stakeholder rights/responsibilities. Candidate describes tradeoffs in terms of suggested recommendations.

TOTAL

100%

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Individual Forecasting Interpretation Instructions Instructions

Individual Forecasting Interpretation Instructions Instructions This is an individual assignment and therefore must be completed by the individual student without outside assistance. In order to complete the assignment, first read the write-up for the “Clean Sweep” case study. Then, answer the questions listed below for each part of the case.

Read below:  Escitalopram  (Lexapro) came on the market once citalopram (Celexa)  lost it patten. Citalopram  (Celexa) also causes mild antagonistic effects a

Read below:  Escitalopram  (Lexapro) came on the market once citalopram (Celexa)  lost it patten. Citalopram  (Celexa) also causes mild antagonistic effects at H1 histamine receptors causing drowsiness which is difficulty to tolerate being a young man.  I will share with you that I never start patients on citalopram. Certainly I have

This essay should be 3-4 pages (800-1250 words) in length and must have a minimum of two (2) outside sources from a credible site/book/database as evidence

This essay should be 3-4 pages (800-1250 words) in length and must have a minimum of two (2) outside sources from a credible site/book/database as evidence to support your claim(s). You must use the MLA style heading and follow all other MLA guidelines for formatting (12 pt. Times New Roman font, number the pages, double spaced, 1-inch margins, etc.). Choose

Description College of Administration and Finance Sciences Form No 4- Internship Report Cover Page Student`s name: Student`s ID #: Training

Description College of Administration and Finance Sciences Form No 4- Internship Report Cover Page Student`s name: Student`s ID #: Training Organization: Trainee Department: Field Instructor Name: Field Instructor Signature: Course Title: CRN: Internship Start Date: Internship End Date: Academic Year/Semester: For Instructor’s Use only Instructor’s Name: Total Training Hours /280