Welcome to Premium Paper Help

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer- reviewed research you reviewed.

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

In a 4- to 5-page paper,
synthesize the peer-
reviewed research you
reviewed. Format your
Assignment as an
Annotated Bibliography.
Be sure to address the
following:· Properly
identify 4 peer-reviewed
research articles you
reviewed.

/ 20 pts

· Summarize each
study, explaining the
improvement to
outcomes, efficiencies,
and lessons learned
from the application of
the clinical system each
peer-reviewed article
described. Be specific
and provide examples.

/ 40 pts

· Synthesize the
findings from the 4

/ 25 pts

20 to >17 pts
Excellent

The response
identifies 4
peer-reviewed
research
articles for the
Assignment.

17 to >15 pts
Good

The response
identifies 3
peer-reviewed
research
articles and one
peer-reviewed
article for the
Assignment.

15 to >13 pts
Fair

The response
identifies 4 or
less peer-
reviewed
articles

13 to >0 pts
Poor

The response
identifies less
than 4 peer-
reviewed
articles or peer-
reviewed
articles are
missing

40 to >35 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
summarizes in
detail each
study reviewed,
explaining in
detail the
improvement to
outcomes,
efficiencies,
and lessons
learned from
the application
of the clinical
system each
peer-reviewed
article
described….Sp
ecific, accurate,
and detailed
examples are
provided which
fully support the
response.

35 to >31 pts
Good
The response
summarizes
each study
reviewed,
explaining the
improvement to
outcomes,
efficiencies,
and lessons
learned from
the application
of the clinical
system each
peer-reviewed
article
described….Ac
curate
examples are
provided which
support the
response
provided.

31 to >27 pts
Fair
The response
is missing one
or two of the
required
elements or
summaries are
superficially
addressed.

27 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
is missing three
or more
required
elements or the
summaries are
superficially
addressed.

25 to >22 pts 22 to >19 pts 19 to >17 pts 17 to >0 pts

7/16/24, 4:42 PM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment: Anastacia Okoye

1/3

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

peer-reviewed research
articles in a cohesive
conclusion.

Written Expression and
Formatting – Paragraph
Development and
Organization:Paragraph
s make clear points that
support well developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity
of ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused–
neither long and
rambling nor short and
lacking substance.

/ 5 pts

Written Expression and
Formatting – English
writing
standards:Correct
grammar, mechanics,
and proper punctuation

/ 5 pts

Written Expression and
Formatting – APA:The
paper follows correct
APA format for title
page, headings, font,
spacing, margins,
indentations, page
numbers,

/ 5 pts

Excellent

Response
includes a
synthesis of the
findings in an
exceptionally
well-written
conclusion.

Good

Response
includes a
synthesis of the
findings in a
well-written
conclusion.

Fair

The response
is missing a
synthesis of the
findings or the
conclusion is
superficial.

Poor

The response
is missing a
synthesis of the
findings and the
conclusion is
not accurate or
is missing.

5 to >4 pts
Excellent

Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity.

4 to >3 pts
Good

Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 80%
of the time.

3 to >2 pts
Fair

Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity
60%- 79% of
the time.

2 to >0 pts
Poor

Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity <
60% of the
time.

5 to >4 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.

4 to >3 pts
Good
Contains a few
(1-2) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

3 to >2 pts
Fair
Contains
several (3-4)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many
(≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors that
interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.

5 to >4 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
APA format with
no errors.

4 to >3 pts
Good
Contains a few
(1-2) APA
format errors.

3 to >2 pts
Fair
Contains
several (3-4)
APA format
errors.

2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many
(≥ 5) APA
format errors.

7/16/24, 4:42 PM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment: Anastacia Okoye

2/3

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

parenthetical/in-text
citations, and reference
list.

Total Points: 0

7/16/24, 4:42 PM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment: Anastacia Okoye

3/3

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

  dentify the recommendations made in the IOM Future of Nursing report. Discuss strategies needed to implement the recommendations. – Identify major

  dentify the recommendations made in the IOM Future of Nursing report. Discuss strategies needed to implement the recommendations. – Identify major highlights of the 2010 Institute of Medicine Report: Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Discuss the primary recommendations posed by the report. – Discuss strategies to implement the

Choose one cultural group reviewed within this course. Using Giger and Davidhizar’s Transcultural Assessment Model, perform a comprehensive

Choose one cultural group reviewed within this course. Using Giger and Davidhizar’s Transcultural Assessment Model, perform a comprehensive assessment of how your selected cultural group’s beliefs and practices might impact healthcare decision-making, treatment adherence, your communication, your interventions, and your education to align with the patient’s cultural values and preferences. 

   View the PDF transcript for Critical Access Hospital Case Study: Mayers Memorial Hospital Complete a detailed case study analysis of the given case,

   View the PDF transcript for Critical Access Hospital Case Study: Mayers Memorial Hospital Complete a detailed case study analysis of the given case, using the process described in Analyzing Strategic Health Care Cases in your course textbook Strategic Management of Health Care Organizations. Your completed case study analysis report will include the

Betty/Bob Hickman: Clinical Reasoning Pre-Work Definition & Pathophysiology of the following Disease

Betty/Bob Hickman: Clinical Reasoning Pre-Work Definition & Pathophysiology of the following Disease Processes/Comorbidities ( in your own words): Heart Failure (HF) Atrial Fibrillation (A-Fib) Hypothyroidism Hypertension (HTN) Assessment: ( what assessment findings would you anticipate seeing with the above listed comorbidities: NEURO/PAIN CARDIO/Vascular Access RESPIRATORY GI GU ID (Infectious Disease)

Discussion Post 1-Why is ethical behavior so important in the field of finance? Provide two business examples (one positive and one negative) that speaks to

Discussion Post 1-Why is ethical behavior so important in the field of finance? Provide two business examples (one positive and one negative) that speaks to how ethical decisions impact company reputations. Describe how ethical choices positively reflect the Christian worldview in business. 2-Should cryptocurrency be regulated? Explain your answer.