Welcome to Premium Paper Help

premiumpaperhelp.com logo

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

See attached document Study Guide for Benztropine This week, you will create a Medication Study Guide to share with your peers. This guide is

See attached document

Study Guide for Benztropine

This week, you will create a Medication Study Guide to share with your peers. This guide is intended to be a useful learning tool for you to use as you prepare for your clinical courses.

Create a 3- to 4-page (excluding visual elements) Medication Study Guide for your assigned psychotropic medication agents that may be utilized by you and colleagues for study. Your medication guide should be in the form of an outline and should include a title page, citations, and references. You should incorporate visual elements, such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative!

Note: Your Medication Study Guide should not be in the format of an APA paper.

Also Note: Your guide should be informed by the FDA-Approved and Evidenced-Based, Clinical Practice Guidelines Research.

Areas of importance that you should address—but are not limited to—include:

· Description of the psychopharmacological medication agent, including brand and generic names, as well as appropriate FDA indication uses

· Any supporting, valid, and reliable research for non-FDA uses

· Drug classification

· The medication mechanism of action

· The medication pharmacokinetics

· The medication pharmacodynamics

· Appropriate dosing, administration route, and any considerations for dosing alterations

· Considerations of use and dosing in specific specialty populations, such as children, adolescents, elderly, pregnant people, those exhibiting suicidal behaviors, etc.

· Definition of half-life, why half-life is important, and the half-life for your assigned medication

· Side effects/adverse reactions potential

· Discuss clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia Note: Be sure to include screening tools that would be utilized.

· Contraindications for use including significant drug to drug interactions

· Overdose considerations

· Diagnostics and labs monitoring comorbidities considerations

· Legal, ethical, and social considerations

· Pertinent patient education considerations

Support your rationale with a minimum of three (3) academic resources.

Please review the grading rubric for criteria evaluated.

NURS_6630_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6630_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes brand and generic names, FDA uses, classification, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, dosing, administration, considerations for alternate dosing, considerations for prescribing specialty populations, definition of half-life, why half-life important, and what is the half-life for assigned medication, side effects/adverse reaction potentials, contraindications, overdose considerations, diagnostics/labs, and patient education consideration.

50 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The study guide comprehensively and clearly describes all of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication.

36 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes 75% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication.

24 to >11.0 pts

Fair

The response describes 50% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication. Noted some inaccuracy in information provided.

11 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes 25% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication. Noted significant inaccuracies in information provided.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia with screening tool to be utilized included.

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Includes screening tools.

18 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Includes screening tools.

15 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Provides inaccurate screening tools.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies clinical concerns with EPS and/or Tardive Dyskinesia, or it is missing. No screening tools.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes legal, ethical and social considerations.

10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the analysis.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good

The response accurately analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the analysis.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the analysis.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the analysis, or it is missing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 3–4 pages. Three evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources were used.

10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 3–4 pages. Three evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 5 pages. Three evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline, but no visual elements included for the appropriate audience. The guide is not as succinct and is 6–7 pages. two (2) evidence-based, peer reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The study guide is not properly formatted as an outline but is a paper. The guide is long, succinct, and is 8+ pages. One or no evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Comparison of Respiratory Disorders Asthma

Comparison of Respiratory Disorders Asthma Emphysema Chronic Bronchitis Pneumonia Pathophysiology Etiology/Population at Risk Clinical Manifestations including Laboratory data Typical Nursing Diagnosis Interventions 11/16/2021 image1.png

 PRESENT THE CASE  In 1–2 sentences, identify and describe the presenting problem. In 1–2 sentences, briefly define and conceptualize the problem from a

 PRESENT THE CASE  In 1–2 sentences, identify and describe the presenting problem. In 1–2 sentences, briefly define and conceptualize the problem from a cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientation. Formulate two assessment questions that you will ask the client to better understand the client’s problem. Remember, the assessment questions should be guided by