Welcome to Premium Paper Help

see attached Create a 4-minute narrated PowerPoint showing research regarding Grit (major researcher Angela Duckworth) or resilience. You must use a

see attached

Create a 4-minute narrated PowerPoint showing research regarding Grit (major researcher Angela Duckworth) or resilience. You must use at least three academic sources. 

Grading Rubic:

Criteria

No Submission

Novice

Basic

Proficient

Exceptional

Criterion Score

Topic Selection (10 Points)

0 points

Points
Equal 0
No
Assignment
Submitted.

0 points

Topic not
related to class
materials.

0 Points

0 points

Section
Points
Possible 0

0 points

Section
Points
Possible 0

10 points

Topic
relates to
contemporary
business
issues
covered in
modules
one or
two.
9 – 10
Points

Score of Topic Selection (10 Points),

/ 10

Presentation Content – Introduction (15 Points)

0 points

Points
Equal 0
No
Assignment
Submitted.

10 points

No
introduction
provided
Below 11

12 points

Introduction
captures
few/some
major
aspects of
the article
in a wordy
manner.
11-12
Points

13 points

Introduction
captures
some/all
major
aspects of
the
presentation
in an
adequate
way.
12-13
Points

15 points

Introduction
captures
all major
aspects of
the article
in a succinct way.
13-15
Points

Score of Presentation Content – Introduction (15 Points),

/ 15

Presentation Content -Body of Presentation (15 Points)

0 points

Points
Equal 0
No
Assignment
Submitted.

10 points

Overall
topic was
not
identified
or
explained.

Below 11

12 points

Topic of
presentation is
paraphrased from articles and does not reflect
understanding
of the topic.

11-12 Points

13 points

Topic of
presentation is
summarized and
adequate.

12-13 Points

15 points

Body of
presentation
clearly
identifies and
explains the topic in own words reflecting
in-depth understaning of topic.

13-15 Points

Score of Presentation Content -Body of Presentation (15 Points),

/ 15

Presentation Content – Conclusion (15 Points)

0 points

Points
Equal 0
No
Assignment
Submitted

10 points

No real
conclusion.
Topic
simply
summarized
again.

Below 11 Points

12 points

Conclusion
is vague
and does
not
demonstrate
critical
thinking.

11-12
Points

13 points

Conclusion
is adequate and
demonstrate some critical thinking.

12-13
Points

15 points

Conclusion is effective, summarizes key points, and
demonstrates
critical thinking.

13-15
Points

Score of Presentation Content – Conclusion (15 Points),

/ 15

Presentation Quality – PowerPoint Presentation (15 Points)

0 points

Points
Equal 0
No
Assignment
Submitted.

10 points

Not
presentedPowerPoint Only

Below 11

12 points

Presentation
consists of
re-reading
article reviews.
Ineffective body
language.

11-12 Points

13 points

Presentation
seems adequately organized rehearsed
and captures
the topic’s
essence.

12-13 Points

15 points

Presentation
is wellorganized,
rehearsed
and captures
the topic’s
essence.
Good body
language.

13-15 Points

Score of Presentation Quality – PowerPoint Presentation (15 Points),

/ 15

Presentation Quality – Evidence, Style, and Body Language (15 Points)

0 points

Points
Equal 0
No Assignment
Submitted.

10 points

Presentation
lacks a cohesive
professional design style.
Slides are
more of a
“readalong” with too much text.

Below 11

12 points

Presentation
lacks a
professional
style, is
limited to
a single source of evidence, and/or does not
adhere to
APA citation
guidelines.

11-12 Points

13 points

PowerPoint
slides are
adequate
but lack innovation and
professional
style, minimal
sources of
evidence, and
deviates from APA citation
guidelines.

12-13 Points

15 points

PowerPoint
slides are
professional
in style,
include a balance of graphics
and text, use multiple sources, adheres to APA citation guidelines.

13-15 Points

Score of Presentation Quality – Evidence, Style, and Body Language (15 Points),

/ 15

Presentation Quality -Length of Time (15 Points)

0 points

Points
Equal 0 No
Assignment
Submitted.

10 points

Presentation
is less
than 2.5
or greater
than 5.5
minutes.

Below 11

12 points

Presentation
is between
2.5 and 3 or between 5 and 5.5
minutes.

11-12 Points

13 points

Presentation
is between 3 and 3.5 or 4.5 and
5 minutes.

12-13 Points

15 points

Presentation
is between
3.5 and
4.5 minutes.

13-15 Points

Score of Presentation Quality -Length of Time (15 Points),

/ 15

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi

Description ‫المملكة العربية السعودية‬ ‫وزارة التعليم‬ ‫الجامعة السعودية اإللكترونية‬ Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Ministry of Education Saudi Electronic University Department of Business Administration College of Administrative and Financial Sciences Assignment 1 MGT324 (1st Term 2024-2025) Public Management (MGT 324) Due Date: 5/10/2024 Course Name: Public Management Student’s Name: Course Code:

Discussion: Discuss how the three-dimensional art can stimulate the Naturalistic intelligence from Gardner’s theory. 

Discussion: Discuss how the three-dimensional art can stimulate the Naturalistic intelligence from Gardner’s theory.  Charvita Tolbert The hypothesis of multiple intelligences developed by the psychologist Howard Gardner postulates that individuals have distinct ways of utilizing knowledge and that humans do not possess all forms of intellect from birth. Stated differently,

In this assignment, you will  develop  and  deliver  a PowerPoint

In this assignment, you will  develop  and  deliver  a PowerPoint presentation that summarizes the highlights of your Week 6 teaching plan. 1. Develop: Develop a 5- to 8-minute PowerPoint slide set summarizing the key components of the teaching plan you developed during Week 6 2. Deliver: Record a video of yourself presenting

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400-600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400-600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas. Read the Tyrvainen et al. (2006) article (see the Figure 1 framework) and Grahlmann et al. (2012) article (see the Figure 2