Welcome to Premium Paper Help

premiumpaperhelp.com logo

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

 Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project.  Evaluation Table Use this document to complete the

 Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project. 

Evaluation Table

Use this document to complete the

evaluation table
requirement of the Module 4 Assessment,

Evidence-Based Project, Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Full
APA formatted citation of selected article.

Article #1

Article #2

Article #3

Article #4


Evidence Level *

(I, II, or III)


Conceptual Framework

Describe the theoretical basis for the study (
If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here).**

Design/Method

Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including
inclusion/exclusion criteria).

Sample/Setting

The number and characteristics of

patients, attrition rate, etc.

Major Variables Studied

List and define dependent and independent variables

Measurement

Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions (
You need to list the actual tests done).

Data Analysis Statistical or

Qualitative findings

(
You need to enter the actual numbers determined by the statistical tests or qualitative data).

Findings and Recommendations

General findings and recommendations of the research


Appraisal and Study Quality

Describe the general worth of this research to practice.

What are the strengths and limitations of study?

What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research?

What is the feasibility of use in your practice?

Key findings


Outcomes


General Notes/Comments

*Refer to the
Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and HealthcarePprofessionals, Hierarchy of Evidence Guide on the following page

**Note on Conceptual Framework

· The following information is from Walden academic guides which helps explain conceptual frameworks and the reasons they are used in research. Here is the link


· Researchers create theoretical and conceptual frameworks that include a philosophical and methodological model to help design their work. A formal theory provides context for the outcome of the events conducted in the research. The data collection and analysis are also based on the theoretical and conceptual framework.

· As stated by Grant and Osanloo (2014), “Without a theoretical framework, the structure and vision for a study is unclear, much like a house that cannot be constructed without a blueprint. By contrast, a research plan that contains a theoretical framework allows the dissertation study to be strong and structured with an organized flow from one chapter to the next.”

· Theoretical and conceptual frameworks provide evidence of academic standards and procedure. They also offer an explanation of why the study is pertinent and how the researcher expects to fill the gap in the literature.

· Literature does not always clearly delineate between a theoretical or conceptual framework. With that being said, there are slight differences between the two.

References

The Johns Hopkins Hospital/Johns Hopkins School of Nursing (2022). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nursing and healthcare professionals: appendix D: Hierarchy of Evidence Guide

Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for your house. 
Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26.

Walden University Academic Guides (n.d.). Conceptual & theoretical frameworks overview.


Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template

© 2023 Walden University, LLC

2

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 3/27/2024 Vassel “The validity of latent fingerprinting identification as a science has been

200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 3/27/2024 Vassel “The validity of latent fingerprinting identification as a science has been receiving growing scholarly attention. The courts, however, have almost uniformly not only held that fingerprint identification withstands scrutiny under Daubert, but have largely ignored or sidestepped the scholarly arguments on