Welcome to Premium Paper Help

premiumpaperhelp.com logo

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Asthma Case Study Assignment Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to apply the principles of pharmacology to support clinical decisions when

Asthma Case Study

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to apply the principles of pharmacology to support clinical decisions when prescribing for common acute or chronic diseases. Students will synthesize and apply current knowledge regarding pharmacology to an applied case after exploring the use of a clinical practice guideline to treat asthma.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

· CO 1: Identify the most commonly prescribed agents in the major drug classes. (POs 1, 2)  

· CO 2:  Make appropriate evidence-based therapeutic treatment decisions for individual patients utilizing drugs from the major drug classes. (POs 1, 2) 

· CO 3: Apply knowledge of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenomics in prescribing patient treatment. (POs 1, 2) 

· CO 4: Distinguish internal and external environment factors affecting drug action, reaction, efficacy, and interaction. (POs 1, 2)  

· CO 5: Identify client indicators of therapeutic, ineffective, adverse responses and side effects to drug therapy. (POs 1, 2)  

Preparing the Assignment

You will be presented with a patient case and then answer a series of questions in the 

document provided.Links to an external site.
  

· Resources to support completion of this assignment:  

· Course Textbook: 

· Rosenthal, L. & Burchum, J. (2021). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2nd ed.). Elsevier. 

· Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, 2021 

· Direct link to pocket guide: 

GINA guidelinesLinks to an external site.


Links to an external site.

·

Prescriber’s Digital ReferenceLinks to an external site.

Rubric

Week 6: Asthma Case Study

Week 6: Asthma Case Study

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAsthma Treatment Algorithm

40 pts

Excellent

Includes no fewer than 22 blanks completed correctly. Requirements: • 4 Classifications in relation to step therapy • Symptoms and associated frequency • Controller and Preferred Reliever for each step of therapy. • Controller and Alternative Reliever for each step of therapy. (22 Total blanks to complete correctly)

36 pts

Very Good

17-21 blanks completed correctly.

33 pts

Satisfactory

12-16 blanks completed correctly.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

1-11 blanks completed correctly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 blanks completed correctly for this section presented.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDosing: Low, Medium, High

10 pts

Excellent

Includes no fewer than 11 correct responses on 4 requirements. Requirements: Dosing for 1. Budesonide (3) 2. Fluticasone furoate (2) 3. Fluticasone propionate (DPI) (3) 4. Fluticasone propionate (pMDI, HFA) (3)

9 pts

Very Good

Includes no fewer than 8-10 correct responses.

8 pts

Satisfactory

Includes no fewer than 5-7 correct responses.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Includes no fewer than 1-4 correct responses.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 correct responses for this section presented.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTreating Modifiable Risk Factors & Non-Pharmacological Strategies and Interventions

15 pts

Excellent

Includes no fewer than 10 correct responses on 2 requirements. Requirements: 1. Treating Modifiable Risk Factors (6) 2. Non-Pharmacological Strategies and Interventions (4)

13 pts

Very Good

Includes no fewer than 8-9 correct responses.

12 pts

Satisfactory

Includes no fewer than 5-7 correct responses.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

Includes no fewer than 1-4 correct responses.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 correct responses for this section presented.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCase Study

40 pts

Excellent

Includes no fewer than 19 blanks completed correctly. Requirements: Questions 1-11

36 pts

Very Good

14-18 blanks completed correctly.

33 pts

Satisfactory

9-13 blanks completed correctly.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

1-8 blanks completed correctly.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 blanks completed correctly for this section presented.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStarting Treatment

15 pts

Excellent

Includes no fewer than 10 correct responses on 2 requirements. Requirements: 1. Assessment items (5) 2. Fill in the blank statements (5)

13 pts

Very Good

Includes no fewer than 8-9 correct responses.

12 pts

Satisfactory

Includes no fewer than 5-7 correct responses.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

Includes no fewer than 1-4 correct responses.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 correct responses for this section presented.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late up to 3 days. Assignments will not be accepted after three days late, and a score of zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
minus ______ points

0 pts

No Points Deducted

0 pts

Points Deducted

0 pts

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Case Study Title: “Fostering Inclusive Instructional Leadership: The School Redesign Challenge” Background: You are

Case Study Title: “Fostering Inclusive Instructional Leadership: The School Redesign Challenge” Background: You are a newly appointed principal at Monroe High School, a diverse urban school with a student population encompassing various ethnicities, cultures, and socioeconomic backgrounds. The school has a history of academic disparities among student groups and faces challenges

Title: GLP-1 Agonist and Anesthesia   Methodology Search strategy (description with enough detail to rerun the search) Study selection and screening

Title: GLP-1 Agonist and Anesthesia   Methodology Search strategy (description with enough detail to rerun the search) Study selection and screening method (PRISMA flow diagram from the study selection process) Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Data collection (method used to screen and appraise articles) and Analysis (tool used to assess quality of articles)

Directions Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) in which you revise your research questions and provide a theoretical foundation or conceptual framework that

Directions Write a paper (1,250-1,500 words) in which you revise your research questions and provide a theoretical foundation or conceptual framework that will ground your study. Use either the qualitative or quantitative directions below depending on your topic. Hint: Review relevant literature and theories that provide a foundation for understanding

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Gregory

Instructions are attached  supporting doc attached  Presenter’s Name: Gregory Swim Person Providing Critique: Brianna Davis Component Comments Case summary: Case was summarized in a succinct, easy-to-understand manner and was in the presenter’s own words. I understood the issue confronting the Supreme Court. APA’s brief: The APA’s stance was presented in

Cv7-X,li~t­ ~:,,11ed-leJnS: —· ·— ··–·—····-··–·-··–··-·-··—– ——— ····– .. ——- ———-··-·——···· ,. Joints: n A joint is the point of contact between two bone

Cv7-X,li~t­ ~:,,11ed-leJnS: —· ·— ··–·—····-··–·-··–··-·-··—– ——— ····– .. ——- ———-··-·——···· ,. Joints: n A joint is the point of contact between two bones, between bone and cartilage, or between bone and teeth. Joints con­ tribute to homeostasis by holding bones together in ways · that allow for movement and flexibility.