Welcome to Premium Paper Help

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer- reviewed research you reviewed.

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

In a 4- to 5-page paper,
synthesize the peer-
reviewed research you
reviewed. Format your
Assignment as an
Annotated Bibliography.
Be sure to address the
following:· Properly
identify 4 peer-reviewed
research articles you
reviewed.

/ 20 pts

· Summarize each
study, explaining the
improvement to
outcomes, efficiencies,
and lessons learned
from the application of
the clinical system each
peer-reviewed article
described. Be specific
and provide examples.

/ 40 pts

· Synthesize the
findings from the 4

/ 25 pts

20 to >17 pts
Excellent

The response
identifies 4
peer-reviewed
research
articles for the
Assignment.

17 to >15 pts
Good

The response
identifies 3
peer-reviewed
research
articles and one
peer-reviewed
article for the
Assignment.

15 to >13 pts
Fair

The response
identifies 4 or
less peer-
reviewed
articles

13 to >0 pts
Poor

The response
identifies less
than 4 peer-
reviewed
articles or peer-
reviewed
articles are
missing

40 to >35 pts
Excellent
The response
accurately and
thoroughly
summarizes in
detail each
study reviewed,
explaining in
detail the
improvement to
outcomes,
efficiencies,
and lessons
learned from
the application
of the clinical
system each
peer-reviewed
article
described….Sp
ecific, accurate,
and detailed
examples are
provided which
fully support the
response.

35 to >31 pts
Good
The response
summarizes
each study
reviewed,
explaining the
improvement to
outcomes,
efficiencies,
and lessons
learned from
the application
of the clinical
system each
peer-reviewed
article
described….Ac
curate
examples are
provided which
support the
response
provided.

31 to >27 pts
Fair
The response
is missing one
or two of the
required
elements or
summaries are
superficially
addressed.

27 to >0 pts
Poor
The response
is missing three
or more
required
elements or the
summaries are
superficially
addressed.

25 to >22 pts 22 to >19 pts 19 to >17 pts 17 to >0 pts

7/16/24, 4:42 PM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment: Anastacia Okoye

1/3

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

peer-reviewed research
articles in a cohesive
conclusion.

Written Expression and
Formatting – Paragraph
Development and
Organization:Paragraph
s make clear points that
support well developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity
of ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused–
neither long and
rambling nor short and
lacking substance.

/ 5 pts

Written Expression and
Formatting – English
writing
standards:Correct
grammar, mechanics,
and proper punctuation

/ 5 pts

Written Expression and
Formatting – APA:The
paper follows correct
APA format for title
page, headings, font,
spacing, margins,
indentations, page
numbers,

/ 5 pts

Excellent

Response
includes a
synthesis of the
findings in an
exceptionally
well-written
conclusion.

Good

Response
includes a
synthesis of the
findings in a
well-written
conclusion.

Fair

The response
is missing a
synthesis of the
findings or the
conclusion is
superficial.

Poor

The response
is missing a
synthesis of the
findings and the
conclusion is
not accurate or
is missing.

5 to >4 pts
Excellent

Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity.

4 to >3 pts
Good

Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity 80%
of the time.

3 to >2 pts
Fair

Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity
60%- 79% of
the time.

2 to >0 pts
Poor

Paragraphs
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
flow, continuity,
and clarity <
60% of the
time.

5 to >4 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.

4 to >3 pts
Good
Contains a few
(1-2) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

3 to >2 pts
Fair
Contains
several (3-4)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.

2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many
(≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors that
interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.

5 to >4 pts
Excellent
Uses correct
APA format with
no errors.

4 to >3 pts
Good
Contains a few
(1-2) APA
format errors.

3 to >2 pts
Fair
Contains
several (3-4)
APA format
errors.

2 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many
(≥ 5) APA
format errors.

7/16/24, 4:42 PM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment: Anastacia Okoye

2/3

NURS_5051_Module04_Week08_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

parenthetical/in-text
citations, and reference
list.

Total Points: 0

7/16/24, 4:42 PM Module 4: Week 8: Assignment: Anastacia Okoye

3/3

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Week 4: DQ 4.3 Budgeting & Problem Solving After reading Chapter 19: Managing Costs and Budgets and the following online articles, watch this

Week 4: DQ 4.3 Budgeting & Problem Solving After reading Chapter 19: Managing Costs and Budgets and the following online articles, watch this interview with a nurse manager about budgets and budgeting. InterviewBudget_KellyEdmondson Christman, E. & Ernstmeyer (Eds) (n.d.).  Nursing management and professional concepts. Chippewa Valley Technical College. Creative Commons Attribution

 utilize the mental disorder categories from DSM-5 to do an annotated bibliography on current research (within the last five years) on two disorders

 utilize the mental disorder categories from DSM-5 to do an annotated bibliography on current research (within the last five years) on two disorders derived from the following list of mental disorder categories: Neurodevelopmental disorders Neurocognitive disorders Schizophrenia spectrum and other disorders Depressive disorders Bipolar and related disorders Anxiety disorders Trauma-